IPPG urges greater policy scrutiny of proposed Ghana-Russia 2,000 MW nuclear power project

The International Perspective for Policy & Governance (IPPG) is calling for greater transparency and rigorous policy scrutiny of the proposed 2,000-megawatt (MW) nuclear power project under discussion between Ghana and Russia. IPPG emphasises the need for a clear financing framework, appropriate technology selection, and demonstrable institutional readiness before major project commitments are undertaken. The announcement by Foreign Affairs Minister Samuel Okudzeto Ablakwa on October 31, following President John Dramani Mahama’s engagement with Russian President Vladimir Putin at the just-ended Russia-Africa Summit , represents a significant development in Ghana’s pursuit of nuclear power. It also builds on earlier engagements between the Government of Ghana (GoG) and Russia’s state-owned nuclear corporation, Rosatom, on Ghana-Russia nuclear cooperation. While IPPG recognises the potential role of nuclear energy in diversifying Ghana’s electricity generation mix and strengthening long-term energy security, the scale, complexity, and financial implications of the proposed project demand careful consideration. A commitment of this magnitude must be assessed not merely in terms of installed generation capacity, but against its economic viability, fiscal implications, and consistency with Ghana’s long-term electricity demand and energy planning priorities, a position IPPG has been advocating for over the past year . Of particular importance is the financing structure that would underpin the proposed project, including the respective obligations of the Ghanaian and Russian parties, the allocation of construction and operational risks, and the extent of any sovereign guarantees or other government-backed financial commitments. Given the capital-intensive nature of a 2000 MW nuclear power development, these arrangements will have significant implications for Ghana’s public finances, electricity tariffs, and long-term fiscal exposure. Equally important is the choice of reactor technology and project configuration. The proposed 2,000 MW capacity raises questions about the reactor units being considered, their suitability for Ghana’s electricity system, associated grid integration requirements, and how the proposed Russian partnership relates to Ghana’s existing nuclear vendor engagements and technology assessment processes. Beyond the commercial and technical considerations, the importance of institutional and regulatory preparedness becomes even more crucial. Nuclear power development requires sustained progress across regulatory oversight, nuclear safety, human resource development, grid infrastructure, and the broader institutional arrangements necessary to support project implementation. The implementation of this proposed partnership must be anchored in Ghana’s established nuclear power development framework as coordinated by Ghana’s Nuclear Power Programme and aligned with the relevant milestones of the International Atomic Energy Agency’s nuclear infrastructure development approach . IPPG maintains that the strategic merit of the proposed partnership will ultimately be determined by its ability to deliver reliable and affordable electricity without creating disproportionate fiscal liabilities or compromising established regulatory and project development processes. Accordingly, IPPG calls on the GoG to engage relevant stakeholders to develop a comprehensive framework that clearly outlines the status and scope of the proposed agreement, the financing and risk-sharing arrangements, the technology selection process, and the anticipated implementation pathway.